[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should udev be mandatory?



This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri said:
> mdz@debian.org wrote:
> > > Unless it's fixed (and the author said repeatedly that it will not be),
> > > it basically cannot work reliably unless most init scripts are
> > > redesigned to become dev.d scripts.
> >
> > Why most init scripts?  What sorts of actions need to be moved from init.d
> > to dev.d?  Creation of device nodes?  Or something else?
>
> Every script which accesses a device in /dev/ needs either to be moved
> to dev.d or patched to wait for device creation.

So every single init script that needs access to anything under /dev has
to have a 'while ! -e $dev; sleep' built in?  That's a fantastic
solution.  Any reason the source of the problem can't be fixed to more
closely emulate the old speed?
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.					     Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :					 sgran@debian.org |
|  `. `'			Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-					    http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpYM280x3Haj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: