On Saturday 31 July 2004 15:42, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > A) Include the source of gcc-core in the .orig.tar.gz > > Pro: it's the only way I've thought of yet > > Pro: immunity to [hypothetical] changes in new versions GCC > > Con: it duplicates some of what's in the gcc source package > > That's about the best you're going to get. You have to undo the > lunacy by fixing a specific version of the gcc source anyway. Okay, discounting the removal of lunacy, it sounds like this is the best way to do it. =) > > B) Somehow "build-depend" on the gcc source package > > Pro: no duplication of source code > > Con: it could [hypothetically] break on a new version of GCC > > Con: I don't think you can really do this > > You can't. Also, it would break randomly as the gcc source package > changes. Yes, that was my thought was well. Thanks for the input! -- Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2
Attachment:
pgpqTBRRpRfFI.pgp
Description: signature