On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 12:35:03PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 01:17:56AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > > > Supply *facts*, not hot air. You need volunteers? Then tell the public > > > what kind of volunteers and for what tasks do you need some. > > > Without this you're looking for slaves that do what you want them to do, > > > not for volunteers. > > Now, see, that's where you're wrong. We need volunteers. Volunteers > > that decide for themselves what they do, that don't need to be told. > > That find out where the problems lie, and go chase them. Fix them. That > > believe in the idea we're all chasing. They don't need to be told those > > things -- not by other volunteers, not by bosses, and certainly not by > > job descriptions. > > Read the mail from Oliver Elphick. Message-ID? > > Yeah, we have a project leader, but he doesn't actually have to lead; if > > he had, we wouldn't be as good as we are. > > Really, are we "good"? Yes. When we finally release, our product is good; much better than most other distributions. > Do we get things done? Yes, even if it takes a long time. > Did we release on time? We don't have deadlines; so, by definition, of course we did. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature