* Russell Coker: >> Upstream has already decided to support mudflap in GCC 3.5, which is >> even more far-reaching than SSP. > > Sounds great! Given that GCC 3.5 may not be released for some time, is there > any chance of getting a back-port of mudflap to GCC 3.4? mudflap depends on tree-ssa, which is a major new component of GCC 3.5. A backport would be roughly equivalent to GCC 3.5.