Re: gcc-3.4 upload to unstable
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:46, Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> * Russell Coker:
> > On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:17, Matthias Klose <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> [sent to debian-release earlier this week]
> >> I'm planning the upload of gcc-3.4 packages to unstable this weekend.
> >> There's one overlapping binary package, which is now built by gcc-3.4,
> >> instead of gcc-3.3: libgcc1 (for all architectures but hppa and m68k).
> > Would it be possible to have SSP enabled in GCC 3.4?
> Upstream has already decided to support mudflap in GCC 3.5, which is
> even more far-reaching than SSP.
Sounds great! Given that GCC 3.5 may not be released for some time, is there
any chance of getting a back-port of mudflap to GCC 3.4?
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page