On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 01:05:30AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> [2004.07.16.0029 +0200]: > > A "job description" is a nice word which stems from the enterprise > > world and which doesn't do much more than helping people find an > > excuse to a) fire other people ("these two people have the exact > > same job description, surely we can fire one of them"), or b) say > > "no" when asked to do some job ("it isn't part of my job, look at > > the friggin' job description!"); It isn't actually helpful in any > > way, *especially* not in a volunteer organization. > > I disagree. I concur that one should help and submit patches instead > of saying "here i am, gimme work to do", but before I consider > volunteering for a position, I want to know what is expected from me > in that position. It doesn't always have to work that way. In fact... ...right. <http://mailman.nocrew.org/pipermail/m68k-build/2001-June/003676.html>. That's how I became a buildd maintainer: someone suggested I'd become one, and I jumped in. Feet first. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature