Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 01:57 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>> Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>>
>> > Please don't be childish. If there is something which you think is not
>> > working properly then try to change that in civilized manner and not by
>> > personal flamewars.
>>
>> That has been tried, and apparently failed.
>>
>> FTPMasters are not functioning properly. They have not been for a *long*
>> time. Complaints, most highly specific, have been lodged routinely for
>> *years* with no effect.
>>
> How do you work that out?
>
> The archive functions and prospers,
True. That's relatively trivial, of course.
> packages are still appearing in the
> archive,
At a slow, inconsistent, and unsatisfactory rate. Though somewhat better in
recent months.
> mirrors are still propagating,
True. Hooray for the mirror team.
> various amounts of crap is being
> prevented from getting into the archive,
Evidence please. I see lots of crap.
> there's nothing immediately
> obviously non-free in the archive,
Totally false. There's even non-distributable stuff in the archive,
although that does occasionally get removed, every few months.
> overrides still happen,
And are still inaccurate.
> katie still
> runs
True. Again, trivial.
> and is being obviously further developed.
Evidence please?
> To me it looks like the ftpmasters are functioning properly,
Rose-colored glasses?
> and I'd
> like to take a few seconds to thank each and every one of them for their
> hard work and dedication
Thanks for your hard work and dedication. Now please resign!
> in the face of opposition from stupid twats
> like you.
No comment.
> Scott
--
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Reply to: