[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64



On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-07-14 19:42:22 +0100 Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:00:42PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >>On 2004-07-14 18:03:28 +0100 Chris Cheney <ccheney@cheney.cx> wrote:
> >>>[...] using our conversation that I mentioned as proof that 
> >>>ftpmaster 
> >>>can sometimes be reasonable.
> >>Who had? [...]
> >Perhaps I misconstrued what was written... since several of the emails
> >were from you.
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00025.html
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00041.html
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00042.html
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2004/07/msg00058.html
> 
> I have no idea why you took mine as "proof" of anything, other than 
> that amd64 people knew more than was in the GR. I was asking what the 
> problem is, more-or-less. Or, to repeat from the second of those URLs: 
> OK, so the GR is seeking to overrule ftpmasters? Were these emails 
> sent to them about amd64 cc'd anywhere public?

I didn't cc: the messages anywhere no. I will make sure any questions of
widespread interest are cc:'d to a list from now on.

Chris

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: