On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:17:14PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Am I the only one who's smelling an incoming project fork? I'd like
> it if it didn't come to that.
Don't even say things like that.
Not forking is one of the greatest thing in Debian, and gives it
strenght to exist and grow up.
Please don't be childish. If there is something which you think is not
working properly then try to change that in civilized manner and not by
personal flamewars.
I thought we're all volunteers. Everybody wants to do his/her best for
the project, so personal charges won't help us.
As far as I was wathing this thread the best featured way was IMHO
releasing Sarge without Amd64 support.
After release there is always time to prepare r1 revision and then
include Amd64 with it. I think that if someone really wants Amd64 port
then it doesn't matter for him if it will be r0 or r1 release.
But most our users are using i386 arch, and they're waiting for release
for almost two years now.
Please do not add Amd64 arch to Sid before Sarge release. Even if it won't
be released with Sarge it could potentially only take developers time
to fix their Amd64 bugs instead of RC bugs for another architectures.
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bartosz Fenski | mailto:fenio@o2.pl | pgp:0x13fefc40 | IRC:fEnIo
_|_|_ 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Polska
(0 0) phone:+48602383548 | Slackware - the weakest link
ooO--(_)--Ooo http://skawina.eu.org | JID:fenio@jabber.org | RLU:172001
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature