On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:22:02PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Cheney wrote: > | More private discussion with whom ourselves? ftpmaster refuses to > | comment on any email sent them, the only way I managed to get Daniel to > | respond was that he was already asking me questions on irc about an > | unrelated matter, so I essentially trapped him into responding. > > I'm glad you said 'trapped' because that's exactly what you did. That, and > breaking the confidence of a private off-hand remark in an otherwise > unrelated private discussion in which I was taking time out of processing > NEW packages in order to help you with the fact that a package you uploaded > was worthy of rejecting and yet I was prepared to work with you to solve > the > issue without you having to wait through NEW again. > > It seems though, that I have at least learned my lesson now. I shall never > again attempt to assist you nor tell you anything in private; for fear that > anything I say will be used against me or my colleagues. > > Do you make a habit of telling the world about things said to you in > private > or am I just an exception? I'm glad you have made it abundantly clear that ftpmaster had no intention to communicate about the amd64 issue at all. Some people had been using our conversation that I mentioned as proof that ftpmaster can sometimes be reasonable. Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature