Re: -= PROPOSAL =- Release sarge with amd64
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:47:29PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > This is an ABI transition. In order to cope with this, all C++ library
> > > packages will have to be renamed to *c103, the same way that they all
> > > had to be renamed to *c102 when we moved to g++ 3.3. This took a long
> > > time; the experience of the last time means that we know how to do it
> > > gracefully, but it will still take time.
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Please, oh please tell me that gcc-3.5 won't force us to do a c104
> > also?!
>
> Only if you can tell us that there are no more bugs in the C++ ABI.
Then I guess we're screwed...
*envisions c666-transition already...*
Regards: David Weinehall
--
/) David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /) Northern lights wander (\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/
Reply to: