On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 11:13 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > >1. that the next Debian GNU/Linux release, codenamed "sarge", will=20 > > > include the "amd64" architecture, based on the work currently hosted=20 > > > at http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ ; > > > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > > under? > > 4.1 point 3 > > "3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > Please provide information about the decision you are choosing to override. Useful references would include message-ids from the Project Leader or Delegate in which the decision was made. > > >2. that non-compliance of that "amd64" distribution with the Linux=20 > > > Standard Base specification for IA32 will not be considered a=20 > > > release-critical bug; > > > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > > under? > > 4.1 point 3 > > "3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > Please provide information about the decision you are choosing to override. Useful references would include message-ids from the Project Leader or Delegate in which the decision was made. > > >3. that we will include it immediately in the "sid" distribution and=20 > > > auto-building infrastructure, and take all appropriate steps so=20 > > > that inclusion won't delay the release of "sarge" any further. > > > > Which point of section 4.1 of the constitution do you believe this falls > > under? > > 4.1 point 3 > > "3. Override any decision by the Project Leader of a Delegate." > Please provide information about the decision you are choosing to override. Useful references would include message-ids from the Project Leader or Delegate in which the decision was made. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part