also sprach Andrew Suffield <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.06.29.2342 +0200]: > Honestly now, do you really think it will be that hard? Once you > have physical access to the user workstations, you can take those > and work up. It only takes one user being lazy or stupid. I've > never heard of a company where *every* user was sufficiently > careful. I suggest you pay a visit to companies in the security domain that take security seriously before you continue to spout your all-or-nothing pieces of knowledge into the world. You are effectively just showing that the don't-you-tell-me-about-security Andrew Suffield apparently hasn't made it further than consumer products with respect to security. Or is there another reason why your posts are trying to claim that public key cryptography is, in fact, worthless, and that we should all just give up on it? Or do you believe in the web of trust and its applicability to the real-world? If you hadn't punched me in the nose the other day on IRC, I'd show you what high security means and how certificate authorities are supposed to work the next time you'd come around the vicinity of Munich or Zurich. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature