On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:32:37AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 08:52:25PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > >> > >> Well, if that's a minor symptom, what about the exceptions made in the DFSG > >> in order to accomodate for the old BSD advertizing clause, > > > > I don't believe we have any. > > > >> and the TeX > >> license? > > > > What about it? I don't recall any issues with that. > > DFSG clause 4: > > ,---- > | The license may require derived works to carry a different name or > | version number from the original software. (This is a compromise. The > | Debian group encourages all authors not to restrict any files, source > | or binary, from being modified.) > `---- I don't see the issue with this... -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature