Re: mass bug gnustep programs: policy violation
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:01:43 +0200, Andreas Barth <email@example.com> said:
> * Matthew Palmer (firstname.lastname@example.org) [040624 05:55]:
>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 09:15:43PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> > * Chris Cheney (email@example.com) [040623 20:55]:
>> > > They could just be removed from sarge and be released again
>> > > with sarge+1... Not every package with a RC bug has to be fixed
>> > > and released with sarge, it is common practice to pull them if
>> > > they don't get fixed in time.
>> > You're not really suggesting to not release gnustep in sarge?
>> That's what we do with packages that aren't of release quality.
> Do you really and honestly believe that this bug means that gnustep
> is not of release quality. In my opinion, these bugs are
> non-blockers for sarge, and one of the issues that should be fixed
> for sarge+1.
Not following the FHS does seem like a release issue to me --
though that decision rests with the RM team.
"He don't know me vewy well, DO he?" -- Bugs Bunny
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C