also sprach Dominique Dumont <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.06.22.2237 +0200]: > At one point you mentionned the shortcomings of autotools, it > might be worth to check if cons or scons are more apt to build > X than autotools. While I agree that autotools are mostly a pain, I also didn't find a viable alternative when I went on a quest recently. Scons is powerful and I can recommend it to anyone, but it is an automake replacement and features few to none of the features of autoconf. There is toc (toc.sf.net), but it's very GNU-centric, so I imagine that Debian may be happy with it as long as we don't start supporting BSD-userland. In addition, I know the toc author personally and can vouch for him: he's eager to incorporate improvements into the system, so I guess there could be an interesting synergy. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature