Re: Re: Library version in name vs. so version
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:12:40PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > > /usr/lib/libjasper-1.701.so.1.0.0
> > What's the SONAME of that?
So, where's the problem? The package should be called
libjasper-1.701-1. Unpractical? Yes, but that's something you have to
fix upsteam, not in -devel.
How often does upstream release new versions? I was under the
impression that the JPEG 2000 implementation was rather mature now.
Isn't that the case?