On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 22:35, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:16:38PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 15:45, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > Unless the bugfix is *very* large and invasive, you're best off > > > cherry-picking the changes out of CVS (annoying with CVS, as it doesn't > > > easily show you a changeset across several files) > > > > there are a number of tools around that can help with this. (google for > > changeset & cvs :}). cscvs which I am a upstream maintainer of is one > > such program. > > If I had to work in with CVSophiles, I'd probably be very grateful. I've > been successful with my tla advocacy so far, though. <grin> > > It seems like it'd be a fair bit more work to get cscvs working than > hand-applying a single cherry out of a CVS repo, though. Depends on the size of the cherry really :}. cvs co foo cd foo cscvs cache -b cscvs log :} Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part