On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:25:16 +0200, martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org> said: > also sprach Goswin von Brederlow > <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> [2004.06.15.2058 +0200]: >> PS: rpath is evil, all avoid rpath :) > So can we please add that to the policy? Policy generally does not say things like "Do not do things that are buggy", since then we would have a huge document. Sounds like there are clear cut technical reasons _not_ to use rpath; that using rpath breaks things; surely we do not need policy to tell us not to break stuff? manoj -- Gravity: What you get when you eat too much and too fast. Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgpVaEaAbRgAm.pgp
Description: PGP signature