Re: -rpath and policy?
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 09:13:46AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 03:50:46PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Where should compatibility links point to?
> >> i386:~% ldd =echo
> >> linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00000000)
> >> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x55577000)
> >> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x55555000)
> >> amd64:~% ldd =echo
> >> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0000002a9566b000)
> >> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000002a95556000)
> >>
> >> Which of the two libc6.so.6 shoud it point to?
> >
> > Whatever was previously in the location of the symlink.
>
> Which one? The 32bit one or the 64bit one? Notice how they both are
> exactly the same location and name.
... on different architectures, thus in different .debs. I see no
problem here.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: