On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 05:40:05PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > The alternative to this is to patch dpkg with SE Linux support in the > way that rpm has been. Should I implement the needed functionality in > that manner? I would suggest that. SE Linux is an exception in that it needs to update file system attributes for /any/ installed package. Creating too generic solutions to such highly exceptional situations seems overly broad to me. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature