* Matthew Garrett (mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk) wrote: > Jens Schmalzing wrote: > > >I agree with Andrew. The package should go into sid immediately. At > >normal urgency, there's plenty of time to file a release critical bug > >if need be. > > On the other hand, it's then more awkward to get a fixed version into > testing if the one currently there is found to be buggy and the one in > unstable never stabalises. This is exactly the situation I'm scared of. -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature