Re: fighting spam || avoiding spam
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 09:01:07AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 07:04:09PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > * All machines which are MX for the debian.org domain MUST reject
> > messages coming from IPs in the xbl.spamhaus.org DNSBL.
>
> What if spamhaus goes the way of one or more previous DNSBLs and goes
> out of business by placing all IP addresses on it's list? We'd need
> to draft, vote on, and pass another GR in order to countermand the
> first.
Is Debian really so bureaucratic that we would need to pass a GR to do
something that is common sense? Are we so bureaucratic that we would need
to pass a GR to use DNSBLs in the first place?
What happened to common sense and consensus?
--
gram
Reply to: