Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:30:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 03:24:31PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > This is your interpretation, but as I have stated previously, I completely
> > disagree with it. That entire paragraph is broken (taking spohr off-line,
> > or restricting access to the debbugs spool [oops], would be a "violation")
> Erm ... it says "open for public view". You can certainly view the
> database using the web interface, which as far as I can think of right
> now exposes every part of the bug report database (even if not in the
> optimal way). It's not relevant that the raw data in the spool isn't
> accessible by the world outside the developer population.
The text literally requires that the _database_ (not only the _data_) be
open for public view. Besides which, the last time I was able to view it,
there was some data in the spool which was not accessible via the web
interface (files which had been renamed and the like).