Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 12:14:19 -0400, Stephen Frost <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> * Manoj Srivastava (email@example.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:35:02 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen
>> <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
>> > [Jochen Voss]
>> >> By the way, what was the meaning of "editorial" in "Editorial
>> >> changes to the Social Contract GR"?
>> > Normally, in a political vote, "editorial change" is used to get
>> > people to believe that a controversial change isn't, giving a
>> > minority a better chance to get their vote passed while no-one is
>> > looking.
>> Looking at the vote results, there does not appear to be much
>> controversy going on.
> 482 DDs voted in the DPL election, only 214 DDs voted in this
> 'editorial' change. That, by itself, is something I would consider
You consider apathy controversial? man, a MIA developer must
send you off the rocker, then.
What is the sound of one hand clapping?
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C