Re: closing upstream bugs with debian/changelog
Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 09:22:06PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
>> In that case could I possibly ask you to reply to the paragraph that
>> you're disagreeing with rather than the first one that happens to
>> come along?
>
> Your opinion about changelogs is not new to me and I feel no need to rehash
> that discussion. However, your claim that most developers agree with you is
> new (and, I think, unfounded).
Where did I claim that? Please reread my message. My claim was that
most agreed with the notion of closing bugs with a single message sent
to the -done address documenting the version of the package that the
bug is fixed in.
Have you still got a problem with that claim?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Reply to: