Re: testing and no release schedule
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Adam McKenna <email@example.com> wrote:
> > I'm not suggesting dropping support. Please learn to read. I'm saying that
> > architectures with RC bugs that are not popular should not hold up the
> > release. They can be released later. It will be up to the individual arch
> > teams when the release happens.
> You are aware that we do not have any infrastructure for a delayed
> release of some archs or know how to do it?
Yes, we do. We simply say:
"Debian 3.1 is released on these platforms:
The rest of the platforms will be there, just not officially.
> What happens if foo is buggy on arm at time X when i386 releases? You
> change the source and put it into the next point-release of i386?
Backport when possible and do point releases. If not, they'll have to wait
for the next release. This won't be much of a problem if we're on a shorter
Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>