Re: testing and no release schedule
Adam McKenna <email@example.com> wrote:
> I'm not suggesting dropping support. Please learn to read. I'm saying that
> architectures with RC bugs that are not popular should not hold up the
> release. They can be released later. It will be up to the individual arch
> teams when the release happens.
You are aware that we do not have any infrastructure for a delayed
release of some archs or know how to do it?
What happens if foo is buggy on arm at time X when i386 releases? You
change the source and put it into the next point-release of i386?
You'd have to freeze the autobuilders to upgrading to sid. You'd have
to make the testing scripts smarter.
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel