more overly-generic package names from gnustep

[Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp>]

I see there's some new gnustep packages with overly-generic names.

Is there a reason why these aren't all prefixed with `gnustep-' or `gs-'
or something?

Can someone remind me of the result of the last time this was argued
about?

[A quick list of offending (IMHO) packages:

  viewpdf
  textedit
  terminal
  preferences
  imageviewer
  clipbook
  camera
  addressmanager

]

Thanks,

-Miles
-- 
Suburbia: where they tear out the trees and then name streets after them.