Re: ppp bug and maintainer's negative attitude
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This shouldn't be needed, #175480 contains a short patch that seems to
apply against the package in woody.
Actually there are two:
1) a smaller one that applies cleanly, but functionality is untested
2) a larger one that is supposedly "cleaner" yet does not apply to
stable (I can confirm one hunk fails, as reported by another submission
to the same report)
Problem is, I am not a maintainer nor do I play one on tv, so I would
much prefer a debian-sanctioned update to fix this problem. That is,
after all is said and done, one of the reasons for using a distribution,
especially one called "stable", right?
Homepage: http://andrea.borgia.bo.it / Amateur radio: IZ4FHT
Key fingerprint: 4037 9711 85C6 F9F9 A505 FA0A BB62 3A3C F7BA 9B13