Re: [debian-printing] Packaging of vendor PPD files.
"Per Olofsson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I then propose the following way to handle PPDs (Postscript Printer
> Descriptions) in Debian:
> * PPD collection packages should be named ppd-<vendor>.
> * PPDs in PPD collection packages should be put in
OK. Just a note: Gimp-Print will be split like so:
gimp-print/$version/$language_$region/ so tools will have to cope with
a "deep" tree.
> * A meta package, ppd-all, should depend on all PPD collection
I'd prefer ppd-common or ppd-base (I take "all" imply "everything").
> * Packages which use PPDs should make use of the PPDs in
> /usr/share/postscript/ppd. For example, the cupsys package could
> simply include a symlink in /usr/share/cups/model/ to
I take it that /usr/share/postscript/ppd would be provided by ppd-all.
What else would this package provide (if anything)?
> I'm not sure if /usr/share/postscript/ppd is the right directory to
> use, one could also imagine simply using /usr/share/ppd since
> /usr/share/postscript doesn't seem to be used for anything else.
/usr/share/ppd seems OK to me. If we used /usr/share/postscript, if
there anything else that it could be used for?
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.