Re: *UNAPPROVED* dpkg nmu
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:39, "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Adam is a major stakeholder in arguably the most important package
> in Debian. At a time when communication seems to be a major problem all
> over Debian, I wouldn't consider the use of even $600 to be a waste of
> money. IMO of course.
Maybe we should do a "matching funds" scheme for such things?
If we find Debian developers who agree with you strongly enough to contribute
$300 then using Debian funds for the other $300 sounds reasonable to me.
Then we just have to find people willing to provide free accomodation for
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page