Hi! On 2004-02-27 19:24 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote: > And that doesn't solve the problem of > It's-called-Firefox-everywhere-except-Debian. If it is really that restrictive, then this really should be It's-called-Firefox-everywhere-except-every-available-linux-and-bsd-distribution, shouldn't it? Do you know how RedHat, SuSE, *BSD, etc. solved this? On 2004-02-27 20:41 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > (b) Then ask them to please explicitly permit naming unofficial builds > "Mozilla" and "Firefox" provided they are clearly labelled as unofficial > builds, or alternately to provide alternate names for unofficial builds ASAP. > They *really* ought to agree to that. :-P ... in the light of the above conclusion, this seems to be even more urgent. By now it seems to make Firefox kind of non-free (regarding the name, which IMHO is very important for identifying a piece of software). Martin -- Martin Pitt Debian GNU/Linux Developer martin@piware.de mpitt@debian.org http://www.piware.de http://www.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature