Re: [40208.nospam@comcast.net: F*cking tired with these broken package orphaned?]
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:10:36AM +0100, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> was heard to say:
> Le sam 28/02/2004 à 10:59, Nano Nano a écrit :
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:49:11AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 08:02:26PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote:
> > > > Care to explain a bit more what is going on here?
> > >
> > > Developers wear their hearts on their sleeves. Or, failing that, their
> > > changelog entries.
> >
> > What actually changed? From reading the **Changelog**, I have no clue.
>
> Like the changelog says: it was orphaned.
The changelog does not say that, though -- it's not even a coherent
sentence! All I got out of it was that Christian was frustrated about
something being broken and/or orphaned. I had to read vte's changelog
to figure out what was really happening.
Daniel
--
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
| "Hmm, do I understand correctly that we've introduced a 1970 bug in |
| order to move the 2038 bug to 2106?" |
| -- Richard Braakman |
\----------------- The Turtle Moves! -- http://www.lspace.org ----------------/
Reply to: