On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:03:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > I intend to hijack the GDM package. It has several issues that should be > > dealt with before sarge releases, and many long-standing open bugs. > > This is not an ultimatum. I don't like ultimatums. I just want to take > > care of this package's maintenance, with the GNOME team as > > co-maintainers, unless there are serious objections. > > Did you discuss this privately with the maintainer before announcing that > you intend to hijack the package? Isn't that kind of ruled out by the usage of the term "hijacking"? > If so, what was the outcome? If it was discussed privately, I'd guess the answer was "no"; if it was "yes", it's not a hijacking -- it's a shift change. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | Sometimes, getting your patch in is Debian GNU/Linux | just a matter of waiting for branden@debian.org | somebody else to reimplement it. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Jonathan Corbet
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature