On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 11:00:59PM +0100, Florent Rougon wrote: > Hi, > > Tilo Schwarz <list@tilo-schwarz.de> wrote: > > > Hi together, > > [...] > > > here). For me, KISS would be more like that: > > [ piece of code ] > > > But, as always, it's a matter of taste... > > I agree that your way of coding this particular algorithm is relatively > elegant. I said in another message that I would have done this way if > there would have been a bit more different message types. It's a fuzzy > threshold problem as when to deploy a generic machinery or not. Given that both ways work about as well (and that was more or less what I had in mind), it quite effectively disproves your claim that this problem could not have been solved as neatly without exceptions. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature