On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:55:16AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 03:04:39PM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > ...a mail that appeared via debian-devel-announce. > > How odd. That's a developers only list and Ingo's no developer. Who was > it signed by? > > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Feb 22 00:49:39 2004) --] > gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 22 00:04:39 2004 EST using DSA key ID 7F4E0E11 > gpg: Good signature from "Bastian Blank <bastianb@gmx.de>" > gpg: aka "Bastian Blank <waldi_@gmx.de>" > ... > > Ahh. From the DMUP: > > ] Examples of what we consider net abuse: > ] * Forged headers and / or Addresses > ] > ] Forging headers or messages means sending mail such that its origin > ] appears to be another user or machine, or a non-existent machine. > > ] * Penalties > ] If someone violates the rules set in this document he will be subjected > ] to a penalty. The penalty depends on the number of previous violations > ] and the offense involved. > ] > ] 1. First offense > ] 1. The accounts of the offender will be suspended and access > ] will not be available. > > Complaints are completely off topic for announcement lists. WTF were you > thinking? Whew. Thank God we don't have to address the actual contents of Ingo's mail! -- G. Branden Robinson | I had thought very carefully about Debian GNU/Linux | committing hara-kiri over this, but branden@debian.org | I overslept this morning. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Toshio Yamaguchi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature