On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 06:14:28PM +0100, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > >> All of this doesn't change the fact that Perl code actually has to test > >> for errors _all_the_time_ if it wants to be reliable -- it's very easy > >> to overlook exactly the one call which will later bite you. :-/ > > > > "It's very easy to write broken code". > > > The whole _point_ of this (part of the) discussion is that in Python, code > that doesn't explicitly test for errors is perfectly OK because the > interpreter does it for you. I would say that the whole point was that is *not* okay. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature