On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:55:40PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: > > > >There has been a responce of some kind, also James claims this thread > > > >wasn't the cause. I have been rejected. > > > The natural response would be to immediately cease all activities for > > > the Debian project and to withdraw all resources dedicated for Debian. > > That would be the "I'm taking my bat and ball and going home" method of > > playing well with others, yes? That's not everyone's natural response, > Well, you can argue as well that the rejection is a sign of not honoring > Goswins work for the project and that further investment of his work, time, > machines and money would be a rip off to him, because he isn't wanted in the > project, but the project itself want his resources nevertheless. You could argue that, but it would be stupid, and only serve to demonstrate the low regard that *you* have for the many bug reporters, upstream developers, and others whose contributions we honor in spite of not believing that they should all be made Debian developers. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpoqf8avr2si.pgp
Description: PGP signature