Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:55:40PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > That would be the "I'm taking my bat and ball and going home" method of
> > > playing well with others, yes? That's not everyone's natural response,
> >
> > Well, you can argue as well that the rejection is a sign of not honoring
> > Goswins work for the project and that further investment of his work, time,
> > machines and money would be a rip off to him, because he isn't wanted in the
> > project, but the project itself want his resources nevertheless.
>
> You could argue that, assuming you knew the reason for the rejection and
> that it was spurious. I don't know the reason for the rejection, and
> therefore I'm not going to start talking about ripping off.
>
> Goswin is, of course, free to not contribute to the project any more for any
> reason - rejection, acceptance (a la Groucho Marx), or because that's what
> his tea leaves told him to do. I was merely providing a view alternative to
> Marc's.
>
> - Matt
I'm taking a middle ground. I still use and care for debian so
investing something is still for my own benefit. But I'm reducing that
considerably, including planed money investments and hardware
donations.
MfG
Goswin
Reply to: