Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:38:14 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 87oervc39l.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200402190014.15776.will@misconception.org.uk> (Will Newton's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:14:15 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 20040215015257.GU18199@einval.com> <[🔎] 87brnwgje3.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <[🔎] E1AtasL-0005uT-00@sledge.mossbank.org.uk> <[🔎] 200402190014.15776.will@misconception.org.uk>

Steve McIntyre wrote:
> I know of nobody here trying to follow testing or unstable via dialup...

I do, though I don't follow very closely and don't have monsters like
OpenOffice installed.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

References:
- Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
  - From: Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com>
- Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
  - From: Will Newton <will@misconception.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Next by Date: Mailing lists
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Next by thread: Re: Packaging _still_ wasteful for many large packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread