Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:52:47PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:08:23AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Anthony Towns <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > No, that's the time for other people to offer assistance you can use. If
> > Perfectly usable assistance was offered. If some (unarguably) bonehead
> > came along, wanted to take over a jobs and got rejected no big
> > argument would have arisen. That was not the case.
> The people who get to decided whether the help is useful or not are the
> ones doing the job, not the ones offering the help. There are plenty of
> ways of demonstrating that an idea that's been rejected is a good one
> in a way that'll convince the existing delegates to change their minds;
> ranting on the lists and invoking the DPL is rarely one of them.
I think it is perfectly reasonable for them to make their case on
debian-devel. What is it about setting out the complaint here that
offends you so much?
Let's get the problems out in the open so they can be identified and