Re: Experimental packages not being aged properly?
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 12:14:20AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 05:26:06PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> > Section 126.96.36.199 of the developer's reference says:
> > the experimental packages are automatically removed once you upload
> > the package in unstable with a higher version number.
> > But a p.d.o search on the libldap2 package shows that both testing and
> > unstable have higher version numbers (2.1.23-1) than the experimental
> > package (2.1.12-1). The experimental package is still there.
> File a bug on the developer's reference, that's probably out of date by
> several years, if if wasn't incorrect when it was first added...
It should say "semi-automatically" instead.
Colin Watson [email@example.com]