On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 13:51, Santiago Vila wrote: > Is it > really fair to favor non-subscribers, who do not even have to register > in the whitelist to be able to post, over subscribers, who have to > receive all the crap in their mailboxes? Like this e-mail. I believe this has been hashed to death many times before. Once again it probably will be again. Wasting Thousands of MB in distributing it (the dead discussion that always ends up in keeping it a non-member postings allowed mail-list.) Thanks, but I already put up with uselss *SPAM* for \/1@GR@ (Viagra) and making my schlong bigger and beefier. As well as All the stuff you complain about. If you aren't prepared to filter mail, which I've been doing since before USENET got those "cross-posters". You won't solve this and neither "will" anyone else. -- greg, greg@gregfolkert.net REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part