Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned

To: Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org, 227738@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:58:03 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040127035803.GA6509@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87u12i12dh.fsf@pfaff.stanford.edu>
References: <[🔎] 87wu7es1na.fsf@mrvn.homelinux.org> <[🔎] 87u12i12dh.fsf@pfaff.stanford.edu>

reassign 227738 ftp.debian.org
thanks

* Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> [2004-01-26 19:44]:
> > w3-el
> 
> w3-el was supposed to be removed from unstable.  Anyone know why
> it's still showing up in the Sources.gz for unstable?

It hasn't been removed from the archive yet.  I was waiting for the
maintainer of eshell, which is in the same situation as w3-el (depends
on emacs20), to confirm.  However, since it's a fairly obvious removal
request, let's go ahead now.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com

Reply to:

References:
- 185 Packages that look orphaned
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
  - From: Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Next by Date: Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Previous by thread: Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Next by thread: Re: 185 Packages that look orphaned
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread