Re: w3m -> standard, lynx -> optional
John Goerzen <jgoerzen@complete.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
[(e)links dependencies are too big]
> That's not true either. As the former maintainer of a package that did
> have such a list[1], I know it when I see it :-)
[...]
You have duplicated my error in
<[🔎] E1AjaKW-0001RS-DB@mid.downhill.at.eu.org>, looking at the links
instead of at the elinks package, elinks dependencies currently
include xlibs.
Please ignore the current links package, it is outdated.
cu andreas
Reply to: