[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian Debconf Translation proposal ( again )



On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:45:49PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:39:14 +0000, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> said: 
> >   $ grep-available -nsPackage -FPre-Depends,Depends debconf | wc -l
> >   828
> 
> > (main and non-US/main only; and a number of those may well not
> > change over the course of a release. In general the *fewer* packages
> > that use debconf the better, probably, as every one represents user
> > interaction in the installation process.)
> 
> 	Umm. My packages use debconf, and templates, but do not depend
>  or predepend on debconf (thye have fallback mechanisms to ask the
>  questions if debconf is not available).  So merely counting the
>  dependencies may not be a true reflection of debconf usage.

While there's the odd exception, it's close enough in my opinion and
experience.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: