Re: apt-listchanges (Re: Advice on how best to handle non-backwards compatibility)
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:31:35PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Neither debconf nor apt-listchanges is a large application. However,
> debconf's dependencies are already priority: important or higher, while two
> of those of apt-listchanges (python-apt and ucf) would need to be elevated
> to standard. I could probably eliminate the ucf dependency with some
> beefier maintainer scripts, but python-apt would need to be elevated to
> standard.
At some point I was planning to make ssh use ucf anyway to eliminate the
nightmare surrounding sshd_config. :)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: