Re: Debian policy about "experimental" ?
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian policy about "experimental" ?
- From: Remi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:10:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87ad8xg85r.dlv@wanadoo.fr>
- In-reply-to: <yjjR.2BY.31@gated-at.bofh.it> (Santiago Vila's message of "Sun, 21 Sep 2003 22:50:19 +0200")
- References: <ygYw.7ia.3@gated-at.bofh.it> <yjjR.2BY.31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> If the snaphots are betas for version 1.5, the solution is to give it
> a version number like 2:1.4.20030921-1, so that whenever 1.5 is
> officially released you can upload it to unstable as 2:1.5-1.
>
> [ If the snapshots are betas for 1.4.1, use 2:1.4.0.20030921-1
> instead, etc. ]
Why use epoch ? 1.4.0.20030921-1 should work (or am i missing something
here ?)
epoch should only be used when needed...
--
Rémi Vanicat
remi.vanicat@laposte.net
Reply to: