Re: First pass all buildds before entering unstable
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 11:33:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > b. They are already kept off testing (if there is a regression),
> > so what's the problem?
> The problem is that other packages which might depend from a package
> which is broken on one architecture will not move into testing. If you
> would keep those packages out of unstable you can be sure that you
> build your own package based on packages which have all the same version
> in unstable. This is the relevant bit of the suggestion. See the lot
> of packages which can not enter testing because a dependency is not
> fulfilled on a certain architecture.
Ah so, the staging area is for a program with all its dependencies?
Isn't testing simply thought for this?
Francesco P. Lovergine